• News
  • NGT freezes govt move to ease construction norms
This story is from January 6, 2017

NGT freezes govt move to ease construction norms

The National Green Tribunal barred on Thursday any fresh constructions under the environment ministry’s December 9 notification exempting real estate projects of all sizes from environment impact assessment and environmental clearance.
NGT freezes govt move to ease construction norms
Representative image.
Key Highlights
  • The National Green Tribunal on Thursday barred any fresh constructions under the environment ministry’s Dec 9 notification.
  • The notification exempts real estate projects from environment impact assessment & environmental clearance.
NEW DELHI: The National Green Tribunal barred on Thursday any fresh constructions under the environment ministry’s December 9 notification exempting real estate projects of all sizes from environment impact assessment and environmental clearance.
The NGT has received two applications questioning legal issues with the December 9 notification, which even has a “self-declaration” clause that will ensure issuance of permission from urban local bodies.
For larger projects of more than 20,000sq m, the environmental clearance and building permission will be given by urban local bodies simultaneously in an “integrated format”. The notification also states that residential buildings will not require “consent to establish” and “consent to operate (CTO)” from state pollution control boards under provisions of the Air Act 1981 and Water Act 1974.
The NGT bench also allowed the applicants’ lawyers to keep a watch on any such constructions coming up and inform the tribunal of the same. “You can’t do legal blunders and get away with it,” a bench headed by NGT chief Justice Swatanter Kumar told lawyers representing the ministry.
The applicants—Pushp Jain and Society for Protection of Environment and Biodiversity — have raised different issues. These include — the draft notification issued by the ministry on April 29, 2016 being “substantially different” from the final one. The exemption from applying for CTO and CTE, for example, wasn’t mentioned in the draft.
On the contrary, it stated that CTO was mandatory for all projects. One of them also argued that the penalty clause in the new notification for violation of environmental norms by construction projects was ambiguous and propagated “pay and pollute” policy.
But the bench asked how a subordinate notification could overwrite these legislations? “Tell your ministry and all others not to act under the new notification, otherwise we will stay the notification. Do you have the powers to issue such a notification,” the bench asked.
Lawyer Divya Prakash Pandey, representing the environment ministry, said that 900 objections were received to the draft notification that was issued in April. “The ministry had constituted an expert committee to review the objections. They even held public hearings. A final notification was issued only after incorporating these issues.” She said that a recent high court order exempted residential buildings from applying for CTO and CTE. But the applicants’ lawyers said that the order was only limited to the national capital.
End of Article
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA